
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2005/06/saw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2005/06/saw</link>
	<description>A Blog Without A Tagline.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:15:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2005/06/saw/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeechick.com/main/?p=49#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Mostly just testing out the new threaded comments option.  I only just got the blog, and I&#039;m still modifying it.  And I&#039;m kinda dreading the idea of a sequel, because of the high risk of &#039;more of the same&#039; but &#039;worse&#039;, or &#039;not even more of the same, and worse&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mostly just testing out the new threaded comments option.  I only just got the blog, and I'm still modifying it.  And I'm kinda dreading the idea of a sequel, because of the high risk of 'more of the same' but 'worse', or 'not even more of the same, and worse'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2005/06/saw/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeechick.com/main/?p=49#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t even aware that you had a blog.Anyhow,I was bored and thought I would check it out and noticed you had a review of Saw. We&#039;ve discussed this in the room before so I&#039;m not going to repeat anything.I,until now, wasn&#039;t aware of a sequal to Saw.I do remember thinking they would make another though.It ended just right.Hopefully it&#039;ll be just as good as the first one.Maybe some cool little suicide devises and some new puzzles and riddles like the first had.As you know,I was equally impressed with the movie.
If I remember correctly,Adam wrote the script.I think he also received a loan or something to pay for the film.Anyways Hunter,nice review since I agree with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn't even aware that you had a blog.Anyhow,I was bored and thought I would check it out and noticed you had a review of Saw. We've discussed this in the room before so I'm not going to repeat anything.I,until now, wasn't aware of a sequal to Saw.I do remember thinking they would make another though.It ended just right.Hopefully it'll be just as good as the first one.Maybe some cool little suicide devises and some new puzzles and riddles like the first had.As you know,I was equally impressed with the movie.<br />
If I remember correctly,Adam wrote the script.I think he also received a loan or something to pay for the film.Anyways Hunter,nice review since I agree with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
