
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fangoria Silent Hill movie article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2006/03/fangoria-silent-hill-movie-article/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2006/03/fangoria-silent-hill-movie-article</link>
	<description>A Blog Without A Tagline.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 07:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jurassosaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2006/03/fangoria-silent-hill-movie-article/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurassosaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 23:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2006/03/fangoria-silent-hill-movie-article/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Nice job transcribing it. The feminine idea of SH never really crossed my mind. After reading this though I can see many aspects of it in all the SH games (The Alessa wierdness in SH1, the monsters of SH2, Sullivan&#039;s belief that the Apt was his mom in SH4, and the many allusions to mother and daughter in SH3). It should be interesting. I look forward to seeing if the big mouth things are the janitors. As for beating on the monsters, the only moral quandary I can recall is the fact that the monsters were always considered suspect. What was a monster to Harry, or Heather/Cheryl/Allessa, might not have been a monster to other people in the town (Vincent made allusion to that in SH3, and Laura from SH2 never seemed to see monsters). In that sense I could imagine the question of morality being brought up. Are you beating down a demon, or an innocent person? No big deal for me, though. Either answer doesn&#039;t really bug me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job transcribing it. The feminine idea of SH never really crossed my mind. After reading this though I can see many aspects of it in all the SH games (The Alessa wierdness in SH1, the monsters of SH2, Sullivan's belief that the Apt was his mom in SH4, and the many allusions to mother and daughter in SH3). It should be interesting. I look forward to seeing if the big mouth things are the janitors. As for beating on the monsters, the only moral quandary I can recall is the fact that the monsters were always considered suspect. What was a monster to Harry, or Heather/Cheryl/Allessa, might not have been a monster to other people in the town (Vincent made allusion to that in SH3, and Laura from SH2 never seemed to see monsters). In that sense I could imagine the question of morality being brought up. Are you beating down a demon, or an innocent person? No big deal for me, though. Either answer doesn't really bug me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
