
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CoffeeChick.com &#187; esrb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coffeechick.com/main/tags/esrb/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main</link>
	<description>A Blog Without A Tagline.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:30:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>No legitimate reason for adults to play Animal Crossing.</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2009/03/no-legitimate-reason-for-adults-to-play-animal-crossing</link>
		<comments>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2009/03/no-legitimate-reason-for-adults-to-play-animal-crossing#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basic Inane Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esrb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nintendo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pedophiles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people are stupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeechick.com/main/?p=1018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least, not according to 'Andy Anderson', of the Mid-Missouri Internet Crimes Task Force.  
I'm not kidding.  It's all in this article.
If your kids play interactive video games, like the Nintendo Wii, be on the lookout.  The Mid-Missouri Internet Crimes Task Force is warning of predators using games like, "Animal Crossing- City [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least, not according to 'Andy Anderson', of the Mid-Missouri Internet Crimes Task Force.  </p>
<p>I'm not kidding.  It's all in <a href="http://www.kmiz.com/news/story.php?id=13725">this article</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>If your kids play interactive video games, like the Nintendo Wii, be on the lookout.  The Mid-Missouri Internet Crimes Task Force is warning of predators using games like, "Animal Crossing- City Folk," to target kids.</p></blockquote>
<p><I>Really?</i>  How come the only link between Animal Crossing and pedophiles I can find on the internet is people talking about this article?  Must be those devious pedophiles again.  </p>
<p>Of course, I didn't really look very hard.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Using the game you create a character and create your own town and house.  When hooked up to the internet you can talk to anyone across the country. Kids playing the game have no control over what other players might be saying.  For example, the character we ran across could be the man in California police are warning about.</p></blockquote>
<p>I don't believe you.  </p>
<p>No.  Really.  I don't believe you.  I don't believe that you actually got a Wii, and a copy of this game, and sat down to play it.  </p>
<p>If you had, you'd know that you don't so much 'create' your own town as 'name it' and answer a few questions which affect the somewhat random layout.  You don't go in and say 'Museum goes here, store goes here, and my house goes here.'  </p>
<p>And you don't create your own house.  You pick one of four houses already built.  You can <i>furnish</i> your own house, but that's something entirely else.  </p>
<p>But that's just me being picky.  Not so picky?  And the reason I don't believe you?  The fact that I doubt you found <i>anyone</i> willing to trade friend codes with you.  You probably don't even know what a fucking 'friend code' is.  You probably think <a href="http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Agent_S">Agent S</a>, <a href="http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Frobert">Frobert</a>, <a href="http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Pekoe">Pekoe</a>, and <a href="http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Static">Static</a> are all actually <i>people</i> who just <i>happen</i> to be online and playing every time you turn the machine on.  They're not.  And <a href="http://animalcrossing.wikia.com/wiki/Kid_Cat">Kid Cat</a> is not the man they identified in California.</p>
<blockquote><p>"There is no reason an adult should have this game," says Andy Anderson, Mid-Missouri Internet Crimes Task Force. </p>
<p>Anderson says adults playing "animal crossing" and similar games are likely doing it for the wrong reasons. </p></blockquote>
<p>'Fun' is the wrong reason.  Of course.  </p>
<blockquote><p>You probably have told your kids never to talk to strangers, but when playing, the heart of the game is building relationships with the animals in your town as well as other players.  To really reach the next level, the game urges you to exchange letters, gifts, and favors.</p></blockquote>
<p>The 'heart' of the game is actually completing your catalogue.  Technically.  And you're not actually expected to exchange letters with 'strangers' -- you really can't, because of the friend code system.  You're supposed to build relationships with the townsfolk.  That's what the <I>favours</i> are all about.  You get in good with them, send them letters and presents [and maybe get some foreign fruit back from them], do things for them -- find them a fish they ask for, or give them a piece of furniture that falls into the category they express an interest in.  Eventually, they'll give you a picture of themselves.  Or, they did, in Animal Crossing: Wild World.  I haven't really been playing City Folk as much as I should.  </p>
<blockquote><p>Anderson says it is going to take parents paying attention to keep this problem from exploding.</p></blockquote>
<p>Something's exploded.  And it's because people were paying attention....</p>
<blockquote><p>"The equipment is real expensive and we cannot afford to buy all of the systems and do not have the resources either to examine all of the possibilities," Anderson explains.</p></blockquote>
<p>...and this is why you're so painfully wrong.  Please do not speak about things when you haven't researched them even a little bit.</p>
<blockquote><p>Right now, we only know of the three Missouri children who have been contacted.  Anderson says this is not something to be paranoid about, but to be aware.</p>
<p>This warning includes any web-based game that allows instant messaging or voice-over IP.</p></blockquote>
<p>And, again, I don't believe this.  I don't think the kids were playing Animal Crossing.  I think this might be as much bullshit as the 'Scary Pedophiles on your DS' thing.  I think this is more about getting attention than warning parents.  </p>
<p>Why?  Because, out of the three current systems, the Wii is the most parental-control friendly.  Now, I could be dead fucking wrong, since I don't, in fact, own a PS3, but, compared to the Xbox 360's online system [which, again, I have little understanding of], the Wii is locked down pretty tight.  </p>
<p>In order to invite someone over to your town [or go over to their town], you both have to have exchanged friend codes.  And, in Animal Crossing on the Wii, there's a voice chat option, which uses the Wii Speak -- a room-wide microphone that, I assume, plays the voice of the other person over the speakers of your entertainment system.  Which makes it kinda obvious if your kiddies are talking to adults -- unless you're a completely fucking oblivious parent.  </p>
<p>...and even an oblivious parent would be able to figure out the Wii Messageboard, where the times spent playing games is posted in a fairly obvious way.  </p>
<p>And, speaking of oblivious, have we just not noticed the rating?  E.  For <i>everyone</i>.  Not 'ec', for 'early childhood'.  We're not talking about The Koala Brothers: Outback Adventure, or Bob the Builder Can-Do Zoo, or even Freddi Fish ABCs Under the Sea here.  Or is Viva Pinata off-limits to adults, too?  And the Katamari series?  And the Lego Star Wars/Indy/Batman type games?  When Lego Harry Potter comes out, are we going to have to create a new rating?  K-Tw, Kids to Tweens Only?  </p>
<p>Is this some sort of ploy to create a Berlin Wall of Games Ratings?  Kids on one side, People Who Qualify to Play M Rated Games on the other?  </p>
<p>Okay, that came out all wrong.  I'm not calling this a conspiracy or anything, but I gotta wonder if maybe that's what some non-gaming adults are thinking.  "Well, videogames are for kids.  But we've got these M rated ones that obviously aren't.  So maybe we need to make a distinction, and keep adults from playing the ones for kids.  Because videogames are for kids."</p>
<p>Here's some news for you: You're wrong.  Videogames are not 'just for kids'.  They haven't been in a very long time -- pretty much since I was a kid.  Perhaps you'd know this, if you bothered to spend more time with your own kids.  My mom made time to play games with me -- I'm sure you can do the same.   I recommend Lego Star Wars, because you'll at least be playing co-op when your kid pwns you.</p>
<p>Oh, and, in case you need me to spell it out for you? Playing Animal Crossing is not a sign of undesirable, undiscovered proclivities if you happen to be over the age of majority.  Not even if you're male.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2009/03/no-legitimate-reason-for-adults-to-play-animal-crossing/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The mission of MADD is to make itself look really fucking stupid.</title>
		<link>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2008/05/the-mission-of-madd</link>
		<comments>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2008/05/the-mission-of-madd#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Basic Inane Bloggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esrb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[madd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[people are stupid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coffeechick.com/main/?p=757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From their blog...at blogspot, for some reason.
April 29, 2008
MADD Calls on the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to Reclassify Grand Theft Auto IV as an Adults Only Game 
Each year nearly 13,500 people die in drunk driving crashes and another half a million are injured in alcohol-related traffic crashes. This is why MADD is extremely disappointed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From their <a href="http://maddonline.blogspot.com">blog</a>...at blogspot, for some reason.</p>
<blockquote><p>April 29, 2008<br />
MADD Calls on the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to Reclassify Grand Theft Auto IV as an Adults Only Game </p>
<p>Each year nearly 13,500 people die in drunk driving crashes and another half a million are injured in alcohol-related traffic crashes. This is why MADD is extremely disappointed by the decision of the manufacturers of the game Grand Theft Auto IV to include a game module where players can drive drunk.</p>
<p>Drunk driving is not a game and it is not a joke. Drunk driving is a choice, a violent crime and it is also 100 percent preventable. MADD is calling on the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to reclassify Grand Theft Auto IV as an Adults Only game, a step up from the current rating of Mature and for the manufacturer to consider a stop in distribution – if not out of responsibility to society then out of respect for the millions of victims/survivors of drunk driving.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here's what it really says:</p>
<blockquote><p>MADD Calls on the ESRB to Demand Help in Getting Attention</p>
<p>Each year we write a lot of press releases.  Tons, really.  And when we heard about GTA IV, we couldn't take time out of our busy press-release-writing and maternal hand-wringing for lawmakers schedule to actually become informed about the game, we've decided to just jump to the conclusion handed to us by other peoples' articles.</p>
<p>Because we don't know the first thing about this game we're complaining about, we're going to do our best to make ourselves look like the joke that we think GTA IV is making out of drunk driving.  [Trite bullshit, words, words, words, emotional argument.]  MADD is calling on the ESRB to let us stick our ill-informed, emotionally-reactive noses in where they don't belong.  Ban GTA IV, because we haven't a fucking clue.  [Hand-wringing, emotional argument, bullshit].</p></blockquote>
<p>Get the hell out of my country, you hypocrites.</p>
<p>No, seriously.  You want it banned, move to a country that's banned it already.  This game does not need rerating.  Grand Theft Auto IV does not turn 'drunk driving' into a game, or a joke, or even a <i>choice</i>, from what I've seen.  </p>
<p>I should probably mention now that I have only watched the game. I have not played it, and therefore am not as well informed as I should be.  I do, however, consider myself to be more informed than the person or persons who decided that MADD should be upset over this game.</p>
<p>That said, I do not know if you can actually choose to get drunk outside of certain 'side missions' -- the dates you go out on with various females, and the social activities you do with various friends.  I suppose you can choose to not do those activities, or opt to not go to the bar, but that could cause you to not fully complete the game.  </p>
<p>And, sure, it's insanely funny to watch the camera wave around in erratic not-quite-circles, and the screen get all blurry when the character is drunk.  And it's kinda funny to watch the character fall over and stagger around.  But I'm guessing it's not so funny when you're actually trying to get the damned character to go in the direction you're pushing the control stick.  That's not really making it into a joke, though, any more than laughing at an IRL drunk.  </p>
<p>...oh, and, what the hell was that little notice at the bottom of the screen about recommending that you take a cab when you're in that state?  Am I the only one who saw that?  I guess you actually have to have at least seen the game played to see that.  </p>
<p>Did I call them hypocrites yet?  Because they are. At least, it appears that they are, because I can't find them comlpaining about <a href="http://www.savealifetour.net/intro.htm">The Save A Life Tour</a>, which <i>also</i> turns drunk driving into a game.  Literally.  They have a big videogame that's <i>only</i> about drunk driving.  </p>
<p>I don't see a rating on it, though.  I guess that could be because they're not distributing it, but it's marketed to kids, and it has a mature theme.  Where are the complaints?  MADD?  Hmm?  I'm waiting....</p>
<p>Either become more informed, or shut the hell up.  Don't try to ban something without knowing what it is.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.coffeechick.com/main/2008/05/the-mission-of-madd/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
