{"id":1257,"date":"2009-11-20T20:43:40","date_gmt":"2009-11-21T03:43:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/main\/?p=1257"},"modified":"2013-02-27T03:06:19","modified_gmt":"2013-02-27T03:06:19","slug":"conclusion-tweenporn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/20\/conclusion-tweenporn\/","title":{"rendered":"Conclusion: Tweenporn"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This should be my last post on the subject.  I&#8217;m not as sadistic as you might think \u2013 I <i>could<\/i> subject you to <i>Midnight Sun<\/i>, but&#8230;I won&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, I&#8217;m just going to&#8230;talk about this&#8230;mad, gibbering horror of a series.  Get it out of my system; say a few things I forgot to cover in the&#8230;well, they&#8217;re not reviews, are they?  And they&#8217;re too long to be called summaries.  I don&#8217;t know what they are any more.<\/p>\n<p>See, I can&#8217;t review things.  I&#8217;m either &#8216;that sucked&#8217; or &#8216;play by play of suck&#8217;.  I haven&#8217;t found a proper balance, and I probably never will.  It&#8217;s something I just can&#8217;t be good at.<\/p>\n<p>Who cares, though?  This is my website.  I&#8217;ll put stuff here, and, if it displeases you, that&#8217;s really not my problem.  I&#8217;m actually comfy with sitting here, rambling to myself.<\/p>\n<p>If you <i>do<\/i> want to read them, you should probably read them in order.  Here, have a list:<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/14\/twilight\/\">Twilight<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/15\/new-moon\/\">New Moon<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/16\/eclipse\/\">Eclipse<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/17\/breaking-dawn-book-one\/\">Breaking Dawn: Book One<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/18\/breaking-dawn-book-two\">Breaking Dawn: Book Two<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/20\/breaking-dawn-book-three\">Breaking Dawn: Book Three<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As with all things on the internet, this post will be waiting here for you when you get done.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;ve read them, you&#8217;ll know that I made no secret of my dislike for the entire series.  I&#8217;ve technically read the entire thing twice now, and that&#8217;s more than enough to have a reasonably informed opinion regarding degrees of suckitude.<\/p>\n<p>Other readers will have formed their own opinions, of course.  When you read something, you see what you want to see, or what you know.  With a series like this, it&#8217;s incredibly easy to read into what&#8217;s there, because there&#8217;s so little.<\/p>\n<p>Yes, it borrows heavily from so-called &#8216;classics&#8217; \u2013 but what doesn&#8217;t?  It&#8217;s nearly impossible to write something without referencing another work, even inadvertently.  This series does it <i>clumsily<\/i>, though.  There&#8217;s no subtlety, with &#8216;references&#8217; coming across more like a very ham-handed product placement.  The best thing that can be said about them is that, when their appearance slams you out of the already stuttering and sluggish flow of the story line, it&#8217;s a kindness.<\/p>\n<p>That the story itself is unoriginal can&#8217;t be held against it; so many stories are.  The trick is to take that same old plot and make it your own, if not in a unique way, then in a way that doesn&#8217;t seem tedious because it has interesting characters.  I&#8217;m not sure that Stephenie Meyer has done that here.  I&#8217;m not even sure that she was <i>interested<\/i> in doing that.<\/p>\n<p>The story itself comes off as if Meyer were following the instructions off a store-bought box.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Place into bag:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Tortured, conscience-having vampire(s).<\/li>\n<li>Other fantastic, shape-shifting beings.<\/li>\n<li>Antagonist.<\/li>\n<li>Subjects of &#8216;social commentary value&#8217; \u2013 racism, abstinence, <i>et cetera<\/i>.<\/li>\n<li>A main character serving as an idealised representation of the author.*<\/li>\n<li>Everyday locations.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Shake, mixing thoroughly.  Bake.  Adjective and adverb to taste, and serve.<\/p>\n<p>*For a more palatable dish, exclude this ingredient.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s Shake&#038;Bake: Fanfiction [G-PG rating].<\/p>\n<p>I suppose I could be falling into the same trap everyone else does, but&#8230;really.  Vampires living off animal blood?  They might even have souls?  The uncommon, endearingly-clumsy female \u2013 whose clumsiness ends up drawing in the vampire, who feels the need to protect her.  He stalks her, watches her while she sleeps, and, eventually, they get married and have babies?  I overthought the recipe.  All you have to do is take the Buffy\/Angel relationship, reduce it so that no redeeming qualities are left [shouldn&#8217;t take long], and dive right in.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe I&#8217;m too old \u2013 maybe I&#8217;ve <i>always<\/i> been too old \u2013 to understand what sort of appeal these sorts of stories hold for anyone.  Shallow, fluffy romance where you know everything will come out fine in the end.  A little too fine, with <i>everyone<\/i> surviving.<\/p>\n<p>These are exactly those sorts of books.  A fake tension hook in the beginning \u2013 and, if you were fooled by the first one, the second one really shouldn&#8217;t \u2013 and a resolution that leaves everything but your faith in a good, plausible story [even if it is about the supernatural] alive and well.<\/p>\n<p>Why can&#8217;t a secondary character die?  Yes, it hurts; yes, if you&#8217;ve done your job as an author, we&#8217;ve become emotionally attached to the character.  It <i>should<\/i> make us cry.  We should be left feeling <i>something<\/i>.  Anything that can&#8217;t be fixed with a dose of pepto and <i>The Talisman<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t care what you think of Stephen King&#8217;s ability as a writer, or if it instantly makes you question my qualifications to even have an opinion on anything anyone&#8217;s written, ever.  When he killed Wolf in <i>The Talisman<\/i> [and I&#8217;m sure it was him, and not Straub, because he does it <i>all the time<\/i>], he made me cry.  Yes.  I cried.  Because I fucking cared about Wolf; King <i>made<\/i> me care about Wolf.<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m not sure where my problem is.  It could be with Meyer for this saccharine little Mary Sue dreamworld she conjured for herself, and foisted onto an undeserving public; It could be with the fact that, as it turns out, the public <i>does<\/i> deserve it, after all.<\/p>\n<p>I suppose I can&#8217;t blame young, immature females for lapping up this godawful swill.  They&#8217;re probably looking for something safe and comforting, and a fictional world in which even the nightmare creatures are safe, where nobody ever dies, is probably the safest thing they can get their too-clean little hands on.  What the <i>fuck<\/i> is up with the older women, though?<\/p>\n<p>Why the fuck do we have things like this:<\/p>\n<p><center><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/coffeechick.com\/images\/twilight\/epc.jpg\"><\/center><\/p>\n<p>Seriously?  <i>Seriously?<\/i>  What the fuck is wrong with you people?  Does your love for this series stem from a history of reading Harlequin Romance?  I hope so, because that&#8217;s all these books are.  Harlequin Romance novels lacking &#8216;turgid manhoods&#8217; and breasts springing forth like startled pheasants when loosed from their restraints.  If the USA Network were to get ahold of and edit your standard bodice ripper, you&#8217;d have Twilight.<\/p>\n<p>If only Lifetime had gotten it, instead.  Then, we&#8217;d have Bella escaping, pregnant, to a shelter for abused women, desperately fleeing her past, possibly reconnecting with estranged family and putting them at risk while they try to protect her from her abusive stalker of an ex that she married [against their advise] fresh out of highschool.  She might even lose the baby.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s a movie done a hundred times over by Lifetime, but it&#8217;s still better than Twilight.<\/p>\n<p>I think I&#8217;ve run out of things to say.  When I post this, I&#8217;ll probably think of a few dozen more things I&#8217;d intended to say, but I think I&#8217;ll leave it here.  I&#8217;d like to repeat my heartfelt thankyous to the person who leaked <i>Midnight Sun<\/i> [you&#8217;re a real-life masked superhero, whoever you are], and to everyone who actually read the other six posts.  It&#8217;s been an ordeal [60 pages now; I&#8217;m so proud of myself]; thanks for suffering with me.<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;d like, we can all meet up for cake and suicide.  I promise, the cake <i>isn&#8217;t<\/i> a lie.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This should be my last post on the subject. I&#8217;m not as sadistic as you might think \u2013 I could subject you to Midnight Sun, but&#8230;I won&#8217;t. Instead, I&#8217;m just going to&#8230;talk about this&#8230;mad, gibbering horror of a series. Get &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/2009\/11\/20\/conclusion-tweenporn\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,23],"tags":[49,163,169,181],"class_list":["post-1257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reviews","category-with-images","tag-books","tag-suck","tag-twilight","tag-words"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p3bMfN-kh","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1257"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2294,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1257\/revisions\/2294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.coffeechick.com\/words\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}